Action based learning

ABSTRACT

A set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with a set of actions is generated by performing at least a first action on data derived from a real-world system. A subset of the sequences of sensed input patterns that form a group associated with the first action is determined. A new sequence of sensed input patterns is received. A first value which indicates the probability that the new sequence of sensed input patterns is associated with the first action based on the subset of sequences of sensed input patterns is determined and stored in a memory associated with the computer system.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/992,713, filed Dec. 5, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed toward the field of machine learning using Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM) systems and learning based on actions which modify sensed input patterns.

BACKGROUND

Machine learning has generally been thought of and attempted to be implemented in the context of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence depends on algorithmic solutions (e.g., a computer program) to replicate particular human acts and/or behaviors. The study of neural networks is a sub-area of artificial intelligence which attempts to mimic certain human brain behavior by using individual processing elements that are interconnected by adjustable connections.

In human cognition, perception and understanding of phenomena happen over time and space. This perception is sometimes passive meaning that we observe a phenomena without acting on it in any way. However, the majority of sensed perception is at least partially based on our actions. For example, the actions we perform such as walking and moving our heads cause constant change in our visual environment which in turn causes us to perceive phenomena from different angles and perspectives. Actions are also fundamental in our learning process. When a human encounters a new object or phenomena for the first time, the human may subject the object to a series of actions in order to “understand” the object. For instance, a child seeing a new toy for the first time may pick up the toy and rotate the toy around to perceive it from all angles.

Hierarchical Temporary Memories (HTMs) have been developed to simulate temporal aspects of perception and learning. An HTM is a hierarchical network of interconnected nodes that individually and collectively (i) learn, over space and time, one or more causes of sensed input data and (ii) determine, dependent on learned causes, likely causes of novel sensed input data. While determining causes of sensed input data is a powerful use of HTMs, this model fails to consider the actions governing the sequences of sensed inputs.

SUMMARY

The above needs are met by computer program products, computer-implemented methods and HTM networks which use spatio-temporal sensed input data associated with actions to infer.

The features and advantages described in the specification are not all inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings and specification. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a flow of data between an object and a human.

FIG. 2 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flow process according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flow process according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 shows an operation of a sequence learner in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 shows a flow process in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 7A-7E show representations in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 shows a representation in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 shows a representation in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 shows sequential data over 4 time points.

FIG. 11 shows a hierarchy of actions and states when driving a car.

FIG. 12( a) shows a model of action based perception.

FIG. 12( b) illustrates the influence of a set of actions in a hierarchy of actions on a hierarchy of sensed inputs

FIG. 13 illustrates a flow process according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 illustrates supervised learning of labeled sequences associated with groups according to one embodiment of the present.

FIG. 15 illustrates a set of high-order groups of sequences based on the labeled sequences of FIG. 14.

FIG. 16 shows a flow process in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 17 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention

FIG. 18 shows a flow process in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 19 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 20 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 21 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 22 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 23 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description of embodiments of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the present invention. However, note that the present invention may be practiced without one or more of these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the description.

A preferred embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to the figures where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.

Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.

Some portions of the detailed description that follows are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.

However, all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.

Certain aspects of the present invention include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of the present invention could be embodied in software, firmware or hardware, and when embodied in software, could be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.

The present invention also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Furthermore, the computers referred to in the specification may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.

The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the present invention as described herein, and any references below to specific languages are provided for disclosure of enablement and best mode of the present invention.

In addition, the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention.

Humans understand and perceive the world in which they live as a collection—or more specifically, a hierarchy—of objects. An “object” is at least partially defined as having some persistent structure over space and/or time. For example, an object may be a car, a person, a building, a word, a song, an abstract entity such as a concept or information flowing in a network.

Moreover, referring to FIG. 1, an object in the world 10 may also be referred to as a “cause” in that the object causes particular data to be sensed, via senses 12, by a human 14. For example, the smell (sensed input data) of a rose (object/cause) results in the recognition/perception of the rose. In another example, the image (sensed input data) of a dog (object/cause) falling upon a human eye results in the recognition/perception of the dog. Even as sensed input data caused by an object change over space and time, humans want to stably perceive the object because the cause of the changing sensed input data, i.e., the object itself, is unchanging. For example, the image (sensed input data) of a dog (object/cause) falling upon the human eye may change with changing light conditions and/or as the human moves; yet, however, the human is able to form and maintain a stable perception of the dog.

In embodiments of the present invention, learning causes and associating novel input with learned causes are achieved using what may be referred to as a “hierarchical temporal memory” (HTM). An HTM is a hierarchical network of interconnected nodes that individually and collectively (i) learn, over space and time, one or more causes of sensed input data and (ii) determine, dependent on learned causes, likely causes of novel sensed input data. HTMs, in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, are further described below with reference to FIGS. 2-27.

HTM Structure

An HTM has one or more levels of nodes. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, HTM 20 has three levels L1, L2, L3, with level L1 being the lowest level, level L3 being the highest level, and level L2 being between levels L1 and L3. Level L1 has nodes 22, 24, 26, 28; level L2 has nodes 30, 32, and level L3 has node 34. The nodes 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 are hierarchically connected in a tree-like structure such that each node may have several children nodes (i.e., nodes connected at a lower level) and one parent node (i.e., node connected at a higher level). Note that it is also possible to have a single child node connected to multiple parent nodes. Each node 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 may have or be associated with a capacity to store and process information. For example, each node 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 may store sensed input data (e.g., groups of patterns) associated with or derived from particular causes. Further, each node 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 may be arranged to (i) propagate information “forward” (i.e., “up” an HTM hierarchy) to any connected parent node and/or (ii) propagate information “backward” (i.e., “down an HTM hierarchy) to any connected children nodes.

The nodes are associated or coupled to each other by links. A link represents logical or physical relationship between an output of a node and an input of another node. Outputs from a node in the form of variables are communicated between the nodes via the links.

Inputs to the HTM 20 from, for example, a sensory system, are supplied to the level L1 nodes 22, 24, 26, 28. A sensory system through which sensed input data is supplied to level L1 nodes 22, 24, 26, 28 may relate to commonly thought-of human senses (e.g., touch, sight, sound) or other human or non-human senses.

The range of sensed input data that each of the level L1 nodes 22, 24, 26, 28 is arranged to receive is a subset of an entire input space. For example, if an 8×8 image represents an entire input space, each level L1 node 22, 24, 26, 28 may receive sensed input data from a particular 4×4 section of the 8×8 image. Each level L2 node 30, 32, by being a parent of more than one level L1 node 22, 24, 26, 28, covers more of the entire input space than does each individual level L1 node 22, 24, 26, 28. It follows that in FIG. 2, the level L3 node 34 covers the entire input space by receiving, in some form, the sensed input data received by all of the level L1 nodes 22, 24, 26, 28. Moreover, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the ranges of sensed input data received by two or more nodes 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 may overlap.

While HTM 20 in FIG. 2 is shown and described as having three levels, an HTM in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention may have any number of levels. Moreover, the hierarchical structure of an HTM may be different than that shown in FIG. 2. For example, an HTM may be structured such that one or more parent nodes have three children nodes as opposed to two children nodes like that shown in FIG. 2. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, an HTM may be structured such that a parent node in one level of the HTM has a different number of children nodes than a parent node in the same or another level of the HTM. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, an HTM may be structured such that a parent node receives input from children nodes in multiple levels of the HTM. Further, the sensed input data may be received by nodes at levels other than the lowest level L1. In general, note that there are various and numerous ways to structure an HTM other than as shown in FIG. 2.

Any entity that uses or is otherwise dependent on an HTM as, for example, described above with reference to FIG. 2 and below with reference to FIGS. 3-27, may be referred to as an “HTM-based” system. Thus, for example, an HTM-based system may be a machine that uses an HTM, either implemented in hardware or software, in performing or assisting in the performance of a task.

Learning Causes

In embodiments of the present invention, an HTM discovers one or more causes in its world from sensory input data received by the HTM. In other words, an HTM does not necessarily have a sense particular to each of the types of causes being sensed; instead, an HTM may discover from raw sensed input data that causes such as cars and words exist. In such a manner, an HTM is able to learn and form representations of causes existing in its world.

As described above, an “object” has persistent structure. The persistent structure causes persistent patterns to be sensed by an HTM. Each sensed input pattern has one or more spatial attribute. In other words, each sensed input pattern may be thought of as being represented as a particular set of bits. In general, a node in an HTM “learns,” i.e., stores and associates with a common cause, sensed input patterns by determining “coincidences” of sensed input patterns in its input. Determining coincidences of sensed input patterns involves determining which sensed input patterns are active at the same time at a rate statistically greater than what would be expected based on mere chance. For example, if an HTM node having one hundred inputs has seven inputs that become active together at some statistically significant rate, then the HTM node learns the sensed input patterns at those seven inputs.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, it may not be necessary for an HTM node to learn all sensed input patterns occurring together at some statistically significant rate. For example, an HTM node may store the x most common sensed input patterns found in its input. Alternatively, an HTM node may store sensed input patterns according a pre-defined measure of significance (e.g. uniqueness).

In addition to an HTM node learning commonly occurring sensed input patterns as described above, the HTM node learns common temporal sequences of those learned sensed input patterns. A particular temporal sequence of learned sensed input patterns may be learned by recognizing that the temporal sequence occurs at a rate statistically greater than what would be expected based on mere chance. For example, if of fifty sensed input patterns learned by an HTM node, three occur in a particular order at some statistically significant rate, then the HTM node may learn that sequence of sensed input patterns.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, it may not be necessary for an HTM node to learn all of the temporal sequences occurring at some statistically significant rate. Instead, an HTM node may store the x most frequent sequences found in its input.

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the sequences learned by an HTM node may each be represented by one or more variables. As each learned sequence is associated with a particular cause, each variable accordingly represents a different cause. The HTM node may pass each of its variables up to a parent node via a vector containing probabilities as to the likelihood that each of its learned sequences is active at its input at a given time. The parent node may then (i) determine coincidences of its sensed input patterns (i.e., the variables received from its child node), (ii) learn sensed input patterns as described above, and (iii) learn sequences of learned sensed input patterns (i.e., learn sequences of variables representing sequences learned by its child node).

Sequence Learning

As described above, temporal sequence learning involves learning frequently occurring sequences of elements and outputting a probability that a given input vector of elements is part of a learned sequence for each of its learned sequences. FIG. 3 shows a node 40 having a sequence learning functionality. The node 40 has a coincidence detector 42 and a sequence learner 44. The coincidence detector 42 receives some input 46. Generally, the coincidence detector 42 identifies coincidences among its input. At each time-step, the coincidence detector 42 outputs a distribution P(e⁻ _(t)|y), where P(e⁻ _(t)|y) represents the probability of observing e⁻ (evidence from a lower level) at time t when in state y. The distribution P(e⁻ _(t)|y) is a vector in which each entry corresponds to a different y, where y represents some state of a world to which node 40 is exposed. Thus, for example, at time t, the first entry in P(e⁻ _(t)|y) is P(e⁻ _(t)|y₁), the second entry is P(e⁻ _(t)|y₂), and so forth. In one embodiment, the coincidences are communicated outside of the coincidence detector 42.

Based on the distributions outputted over time by the coincidence detector 42, the sequence learner 44 outputs a distribution P(e⁻ _(t)|S), where P(e⁻ _(t)|S) represents the probability of observing e⁻ (evidence from a lower level) at time t over learned temporal sequences S. Thus, each entry in the distribution P(e⁻ _(t)|S) corresponds to a different learned sequence S_(i). In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the learned sequences themselves may not be communicated outside of the sequence learner 44. Further, note that the sequence learner 44, has a behavior (i.e., outputting distributions over learned sequences) that may be independent of a type and/or topology of network of which the sequence learner 44 is part.

As described above, y represents some state of a world as understood by the system. Note that the statistical nature of the world is such that these states are likely to occur in particular sequences over time. As shown in FIG. 4, to learn sequences in its world, a sequence learner (e.g., 44 in FIG. 3) identifies sequences and updates them over time ST50. Further, the sequence learner is arranged to collect statistics on its learned sequences ST52 and then, based on its learned sequences and statistics thereof, compute probability distributions (as described above) ST54.

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may have a particular fixed number numberOfOutputs of outputs. Although the sequence learner may identify more sequences than it has outputs, only numberOfOutputs may be represented at the output of the sequence learner. In other words, every sequence identified by the sequence learner may not be uniquely represented at the output of the sequence learner. Thus, it follows that the sequence learner may be arranged to allocate, or “map,” its limited number of outputs among a larger number of identified sequences. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, such mapping may be motivated by one or more of the following priorities: desiring frequently occurring sequences; desiring differentiated sequences (in an effort to, for example, not waste outputs on sequences that are substantially similar); and desiring a minimum disruption to the meanings associated with the outputs (in an effort to, for example, enable stable learning at a higher level).

In regard to identifying frequently occurring sequences, at any given time t, a sequence learner may have to calculate the probability that a particular sequence of elements has been received over time up until time t. For example, to determine the probability that the sequence ‘y₄y₂y₃’ has occurred over the last three samples (i.e., over the last three time steps), a sequence learner may multiply P(e⁻ _(t-2)|y₄), P(e⁻ _(t-1)|y₂), and P(e⁻ _(t)|y₃) as shown in FIG. 5. The product of such a multiplication operation represents a “soft” count of the probability of having observed ‘y₄y₂y₃’. Thus, because at every time t, each input state has some probability associated with it (e.g., in FIG. 5, at any time t, each of input states y₁-y₄ has an associated probability), for every time t, there is some probability that any one of the possible sequences has been observed.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, instead of keeping a “soft” count as described above, a count of the actual number of times a sequence has occurred—a “hard” count—may be kept dependent on having a particular state of input vectors.

Note that there may be a combinatorial explosion of possible sequences received by a sequence learner over time. Thus, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the sequence learner may consider a certain number of input states in each input sample or subsets of the input sample, where that certain number is parameterized by some value. Such treatment may narrow the number of possible updates to a base of that value instead of a base of the number of inputs to the sequence learner. In one or more embodiments, the sequence learner may also have a “memory” that extends only to a certain number of time steps in the past. The number of time steps can be another configurable parameter.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a search space of a sequence learner may be reduced, or otherwise controlled, by considering only those sequences of a given length that have been identified as potentially frequent from observations of shorter sequences. For example, the sequence learner may count likely 2-sequences (i.e., sequences of 2 elements) over a certain number window [2] of input samples. The resulting frequent 2-sequences may be used to generate candidate 3-sequences (i.e., sequences of 3 elements), whereupon, only these candidate 3-sequences are counted over a certain number window [3] of input samples. This process may continue until reaching a number MaxL representing the maximum length sequence to be considered by the sequence learner. In one or more other embodiments of the present invention, the sequence learner may have a different stopping point. For example, the sequence learner may use the statistics of its input to determine the maximum sequence length to consider.

Determining likely sequences as described above may be dependent on a “coherence time,” which is the time over which the statistics of inputs remain constant. For an “on-line” sequence learner (i.e., one that does not loop back over previous inputs), the time required to generate likely sequences up to some maximum length may have to be less than the coherence time. If the time required to identify sequences of a certain length becomes longer than the coherence time, then in one or more embodiments of the present invention, “batch” processing, instead of on-line processing, may be used. Batch processing may involve identifying k-sequences (i.e., sequences of length k) by looping back over the same input used to identify the k−1-sequences (i.e., sequences of length k−1).

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, as sequences of certain length are identified, a sequence learner may keep the associated counts in a table st_table. There may be a separate st_table for each sequence length. For example, after counting 3-sequences, a table st_table{3} may be as follows:

Count Sequence 103.92 121 8.67 224 82.50 231 167.02 312 220.45 423 14.32 412

FIG. 6 shows a flow process for building a table st_table in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In regard to building table st_table{k}, for each k-sequence received in an input to a sequence learner, if a certain number window[k] of input samples has not yet been sampled ST60, the table st_table{k} is searched for the k-sequence ST62, ST64. If the k-sequence is already identified by table st_table{k}, then the corresponding count is appropriately incremented by the soft count for the k-sequence ST66, ST68. Otherwise, if the k-sequence is not listed in table st_table{k}, then that k-sequence is added to table st_table{k} with its corresponding soft count ST66, ST70. Upon receiving window[k] input samples ST60, the least common k-sequences may be removed ST72, i.e., all but the top x sequences may be removed, where x represents a maximum number of sequences that may be kept in table st_table{k} after counting sequences of length k. The resulting table st_table{k} may then be used to generate candidate sequences for table st_table{k+1} (generating candidate sequences further described below) ST73, whereupon the process shown in FIG. 6 may be repeated for table st_table{k+1}. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the process shown in FIG. 6 may not be performed for every k-sequence.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, it may be desirable to refine counts on k-length sequences at multiple points in time after an initial counting procedure. In such embodiments, in an effort to give greater weight to recent counts without abandoning all previous observations, a table lt_table of long-term counts may be created and used.

As described above, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may only consider those sequences of a given length that have been identified as potentially frequent from observations of shorter sequences. In other words, for example, if S_(i) is a frequent 3-sequence, then it is likely that each subsequence of S_(i) of length 2 is also frequent. Conversely, if a 2-sequence is infrequent, then it is unlikely that any of its 3-length super-sequences are frequent. Thus, the sequence learner may consider only those 3-sequences of which each 2-length subsequence is frequent.

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may determine candidate k-sequences from a set of frequent k−1-sequences using, for example, a “join” operation. Candidate k-sequences are those for which the first k−1 samples and the last k−1 samples are frequent. For each frequent k−1-sequence S_(i) in a table st_table{k−1}, a join operation may search for a k−1-sequence S_(j) in table st_table{k−1}, where the first k−2 elements of S_(j) are the same as the last k−2 elements of S_(i). If such an S_(j) exists, the concatenation of S_(i) and the last element of S_(j) is added to the list of candidate k-sequences in a table st_table{k}. For example, consider the following tables st_table{3} and st_table{4}, which show the results after a join operation on table st_table{3}.

Count 3-Sequence Count 4-Sequence 103.92 121 →JOIN→ 0 2312 82.50 231 0 3121 167.02 312 0 4231 220.45 423 To illustrate how a join operation may work on table st_table{3}, the following description is provided. Taking the 3-sequence ‘121,’ the join operation searches table st_table{3} for a 3-sequence whose first 2 elements match the last two elements of the taken ‘121’ 3-sequence. Because there are no 3-sequences that meet this condition with respect to the taken ‘121’ 3-sequence, the join operation may next take, for example, the 3-sequence ‘312.’ For this taken sequence, the join operation finds that the first two elements of the ‘121’ 3-sequence matches the last two elements of the taken ‘312’ sequence. Thus, the join operation then concatenates the taken ‘312’ 3-sequence with the last element in the found ‘121’ 3-sequence to yield a candidate 4-sequence of ‘3121’ in table st_table{4}. Further, note that in one or more embodiments of the present invention, one or more operations other than a join operation may be used to generate candidate k-sequences.

As described above, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, each output of a sequence learner represents a particular learned sequence. Considering that the sequence learner is continuously identifying the most likely sequences to represent at its outputs, old sequences may need to be replaced by newer sequences that are more frequent. If there are multiple old sequences that are less frequent than a new sequence, the sequence learner may replace one or more of the multiple old sequences based on some criteria. For example, the sequence learner may first remove any old sequences having a length of 1.

Further, the sequence learner may, for example, remove an old sequence based on its similarity to a new sequence. The similarity of sequences may be determined based on some distance metric. For example, the sequence learner may determine the similarities of sequences using some minimum Hamming distance metric. The Hamming distance may be defined as the number of single-entry changes needed to be made to one sequence to reach another sequence, including changes to “empty” slots either before or after the sequence (but not both). For example, if an old sequence is ‘1234’, and the new sequence is ‘1235’, the Hamming distance is 1.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a distance metric may consider all possible shifts of one sequence relative to the other. For those element indices that overlap in a given shift, ‘0’ may be counted if the elements match, and ‘1’ may be counted if the elements do not match. This number is added to the number of elements that do not align with any element of the other sequence. For example, if an old sequence is ‘1234’, and the new sequence is ‘345’, the result of the distance metric may be determined as 2. Note that various distance metrics may be created and/or used to determine the similarity between two sequences.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may, for example, remove an old sequence based on the count (i.e., occurrence frequency) of the old sequence. More particularly, old sequences with lower counts may be replaced before old sequences with higher counts.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may limit how different old and new sequences can be before an old sequence is replaced. In other words, if an old sequence is relatively very different than a new sequence, the sequence learner may prevent that old sequence from being replaced by the new sequence. Such control may promote stable learning at higher levels.

If a sequence learner replaces an old sequence with a new sequence, then, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, counts associated with subsequences of the old sequence may be removed from a corresponding table st_table.

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, as sequences are identified and represented at an output of a sequence learner, the sequence learner may collect statistics on the represented sequences. For example, the sequence learner may identify the a priori probability of a particular sequence and/or the transition probability between sequences.

At any time t, a sequence learner identifies the most likely sequences to represent at its output as described above. As described above, the sequence learner is further arranged to compute the probability of actually being in each of the represented sequences given the inputs received over time by the sequence learner.

By learning sequences as described above, a node in an HTM may coalesce both space and time when learning causes. Thus, for example, while a lower level child node learns causes based on patterns and sequences thereof sensed over its input space, a higher level parent node is able to learn higher level causes by coalescing both space and time over a larger input space. In other words, as information ascends through the hierarchy of an HTM, higher level nodes learn causes that cover larger areas of input space and longer periods of time than lower level nodes. For example, one or more nodes in a lowest level of an HTM may learn causes associated with a price of a particular stock, whereas one or more nodes in a higher level of the HTM may learn causes associated with overall stock market fluctuations.

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, computing the output probability over a learned sequence may be dependent on Γ (gamma). Γ may be denoted as a matrix indexed by two variables, S and I, where S corresponds to output sequences (e.g., S₁=‘y₄y₂y₃’, S₂=‘y₁y₂y₁’, S₃=‘y₃y₁’, S₄=‘y₂y₂y₁y₄’), and where I corresponds to the index within each sequence (e.g., S₁[I]=y₄ when I=1). Γ(S, I) may be represented as shown in FIG. 7A.

At any point in time, each entry (S_(i), I_(m)) in a gamma matrix represents the probability that the current input vector corresponds to the I_(m) ^(th) element of sequence S_(i). Each gamma may be determined based solely on the previous gamma and the input vector. Further, even though the result may depend on the input history of all past inputs, only the result from the previous time-step may need to be considered as the result of the previous time-step implicitly contains all relevant information from all previous time-steps. Once gamma is determined, the total probability of sequence S_(i) may be determined as the sum across the i^(th) row of the gamma matrix (normalized by the prior probability of the sequence).

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, an overall sequence probability in terms of gamma may be represented as follows:

${{P\left( {{e_{0}^{-}\mspace{14mu} \ldots \mspace{14mu} e_{t}^{-}}S_{i}^{t}} \right)} = {\frac{1}{P\left( S_{i} \right)}{\sum\limits_{I_{m}}\; {\Gamma_{t}\left( {S_{i},I_{m}} \right)}}}},{where}$ ${{\Gamma_{t}\left( {S_{i},I_{m}} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{y_{t}}\; {{P\left( {e_{t}^{-}y_{t}} \right)}{\sum\limits_{y_{t - 1}}\; \left\lbrack {\sum\limits_{{S_{j}{I_{n}:y_{t - 1}}} = {S_{j}{\lbrack I_{n}\rbrack}}}\; {{\beta \left( {S_{i},S_{j},I_{m},I_{n}} \right)}{\Gamma_{t - 1}\left( {S_{j},I_{n}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}}}},{{and}\mspace{14mu} {where}}$ β(S_(i), S_(j), I_(m), I_(n)) = P(S_(i)^(t), I_(m)^(t), y_(t)S_(j)^(t − 1), I_(n)^(t − 1), y₀  …  y_(t − 1)).

Further, for example, in the case where a given sequence is observed in its entirety, the expression for β may be reduced to the following:

${\beta \left( {S_{i},S_{j},I_{m},I_{n}} \right)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} 1 & {{{{if}\mspace{14mu} {S_{i}\left\lbrack I_{m} \right\rbrack}} = y_{t}},{{S_{j}\left\lbrack I_{n} \right\rbrack} = y_{t - 1}},{I_{m} = {I_{n} + 1}},{S_{i} = S_{j}}} \\ A^{0} & {{{{if}\mspace{14mu} {S_{i}\left\lbrack I_{m} \right\rbrack}} = y_{t}},{{S_{j}\left\lbrack I_{n} \right\rbrack} = y_{t - 1}},{I_{m} = 1},{I_{n} = {{Len}\left( S_{j} \right)}}} \\ 0 & {{otherwise}.} \end{matrix} \right.$

Note that the description above and below in regard to computing (and initializing) gamma represents only an example of how a sequence learner may calculate output probabilities. Now considering, for example, the four sequences given above (i.e., {S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄}, where S₁=‘y₄y₂y₃’, S₂=‘y₁y₂y₁’, S₃=‘y₃y₁’, S₄=‘y₂y₂y₁y₄’), the first two sums in the expression for gamma iterate through every possible combination of previous and current elements. Consider one of those combinations, y^(t-1)=y₂ and y^(t)=y₁. In other words, the previous input vector (though it contains a probability for every element y_(i)) represents a cause of y₂, and the current input vector represents y₁. The expression for β (beta) may evaluate to a non-zero value for those entries in gamma that correspond to the elements y₂ and y₁ and time t−1 and t, respectively. These may be referred to as “active cells” in the gamma matrix as further shown in FIG. 7B.

Note that it may not be enough for a cell to be active at time t to satisfy non-zero conditions given in beta. For those cells that are not in the first column (I!=1), an active cell at time t may follow an active cell at time t−1 in the same sequence. For the example being used (namely, with respect to the four sequences {S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄} given above), there may be only one out of the four time-t active cells for which this condition holds, the cell being circled (at the head of the arrow) as shown in FIG. 7C. Because this is an internal (I!=1) case, the beta function may simply multiply the value stored in the circled t−1 cell by one.

Further, note that beta may just be one function in the expression for beta given above. There may also be a need to multiply the value in the circled t−1 cell (at the non-headed of the arrow) shown in FIG. 7C by P(e^(t)|y^(t)=y₁), which is equivalent to the circled value in the input vector shown in FIG. 8.

Accordingly, the value added to the circled cell at time t is the value in the circled cell from time t−1 multiplied by the value in the input vector indicated shown in FIG. 8 (and multiplied by 1). This may be for only one case of previous and current elements (y^(t−1)=y₂ and y^(t)=y₁). Iterations may be carried through every combination of previous and current elements, performing similar calculations, and the results are cumulatively added to the gamma matrix at time t.

A further iteration may be considered—the iteration dealing with the case relating to the first column (I=1). To visualize this, it may be assumed that this is the case of y^(t-1)=y₄ and y^(t)=y₁. The current element is the same, but now there may be an assumption that the previous element was y₄ instead of y₂. The active cells are shown in FIG. 7D.

In such a case, there are no active cells at time t that follow an active cell of the same sequence at time t−1. However, as shown in FIG. 7E, there is a first-column (I=1) cell at time t and a final-element cell at time t−1. Although this fails to satisfy the conditions for beta=1, it does satisfy the conditions for beta=A⁰, where A⁰ represents the (constant) transition probability between sequences (noting that the general case may be represented as A⁰(S_(i),S_(j))). Note that the circled t−1 cell (at the non-headed end of arrow) shown in FIG. 7E need not be in the last column (I=4), but may be the last element of a given sequence. Still referring to FIG. 7E, the value in the cell circled at time t−1 would be multiplied by A⁰ and multiplied by the value corresponding to y₄ in the input vector, and the product would be added to the value stored in the circled cell at time t.

In summary, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, for each combination of previous and current elements, a sequence learner may determine which active cells satisfy the conditions for either beta=1 or beta=A⁰. The sequence learner may multiply the legal values from time t−1 by the beta and then multiply by the corresponding value from the input vector. The result across all combinations of previous and current elements is then summed to reach a final gamma.

As described above, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, each gamma is defined in terms of the previous gamma. With respect to determining the first gamma, note that the first observed element, y^(t=0)=y_(a), may correspond to any index in a sequence with equal likelihood. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the number of occurrences of y_(a) across all sequences may be determined as follows:

${T\left( y_{a} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{S_{i}}\; {\sum\limits_{I}\; {1{\left( {{S_{i}\lbrack I\rbrack} = y_{a}} \right).}}}}$

The probability of an element in a sequence is 1 over this sum if that element is a y_(a) and zero otherwise:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Gamma_{0}\left( {S_{i},I} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{{y_{i}\text{:}\mspace{11mu} {T{(y_{i})}}} \neq 0}\; {\frac{1}{T\left( y_{i} \right)}{{P\left( {e_{t}^{-}y_{i}} \right)}.}}}} & \; \end{matrix}$

For example, referring to FIG. 9, consider the first iteration of the sum, where y_(i)=y₁. There are 4 cells in the gamma matrix that correspond to y₁. Each of these cells may be populated by ¼ multiplied by the first entry in the input vector, P(e_(t)|y₁). This operation may then be repeated for y_(i)=y₂, and so forth.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, it may be necessary, or otherwise desirable, to initialize a gamma at times other than at time t=0. For example, in some cases, a sequence learner may perform calculations that yield no useful results regarding the sequence to which an input vector belongs. Thus, when a sequence learner has an output probability that meets one or more certain characteristics (e.g., the output distribution is uniform), gamma may be re-initialized as described above by treating the first input vector as a new input at time t=0.

Note that in one or more embodiments of the present invention, gamma will become small over time. Even when high-probability elements correspond to legal paths along learned sequences, there may be some energy in the input that does not correspond to legal paths and is therefore not passed along to the output probabilities. Further, each transition multiplies by a factor of A⁰<1, which may diminish the input. However, the accuracy of the sequence learner may not be affected if, for example, the probabilities in a gamma matrix (examples described above) are normalized to 1. Thus, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the output distribution of a sequence learner may simply be normalized to render accurate probabilities. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, should it be desirable to prevent gamma from diminishing to numbers over time that are “too small,” gamma may be periodically normalized. Gamma may be normalized, for example, by dividing each entry in the matrix by a sum total of the entire matrix.

Note that the description above in regard to computing (and initializing) gamma represents only an example of how a sequence learner may calculate output probabilities. In one or more other embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may use one or more different operations or techniques to calculate output probabilities. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may output a probability for an input sequence as opposed to for each input element. For example, if the sequence ‘123’ is received over time, the sequence learner may output a probability upon receiving the last element, i.e., ‘3’, in the sequence as opposed to outputting a probability for each element ‘1’, ‘2’, and ‘3’. A determination as to when a particular sequence ends and when to output the corresponding probability may depend on one or more various criteria. For example, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, if a transition probability (e.g., A⁰ described above) meets a certain threshold, a sequence learner may then output a probability for the sequence received over time until meeting the threshold. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may output a probability if a transition probability peaks (i.e., a fast rise followed by a fast fall, or vice-versa). Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may output a probability if a correlation between distributions indicates that a new sequence has occurred. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a sequence learner may track a change in a “motion” (i.e., computations) of the sequence learner and then output a probability when there is a change inconsistent with the tracked motion.

As described above, learning causes in an HTM-based system may involve learning patterns and sequences of patterns. In general, patterns and sequences that occur frequently are stored and assigned to the same causes. For example, groups of patterns that occur frequently at some statistically significant rate may be assigned to the same cause. In the case of sequences, sequences that occur frequently at some statistically significant rate may be assigned to the same cause. Accordingly, learning causes may effectively entail mapping many patterns and/or sequences to a single cause. Such assigning of multiple patterns and/or sequences to a single cause may be referred to as “pooling.”

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, pooling may be dependent on “spatial” similarities between two or more patterns (noting that a pattern may actually represent a sequence from a lower level). In such embodiments, an HTM node may compare a spatial property of a received sensed input pattern with that of a learned sensed input pattern (or “quantization” point). If the two patterns are “similar enough” (i.e., have enough “overlap”), then the received sensed input pattern may be assigned to the same cause as that of the quantization point. For example, if a quantization point is equal to ‘10010110’, then a received sensed input pattern of ‘10011110’ may be assigned to the same cause as that of the quantization point due to there being a difference of only bit between the two patterns. Note that the amount of similarity needed to perform such “spatial” pooling may vary within and/or among HTM-based systems.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, pooling may involve assigning patterns that occur in order to the same cause. For example, if an HTM node receives pattern A followed by pattern B followed by pattern D, then patterns A, B, and D may be assigned to the same cause as there is some likelihood that this sequence of patterns was caused by the same object. Accordingly, such “temporal” pooling enables the mapping of patterns, some or all of which may have no significant spatial overlap, to a single cause.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, pooling may involve learning the timing between received input patterns. For example, an HTM node that learns a sequence of patterns A, B, and C may also learn the timing between the patterns in the sequence. Sequences having such timing are assigned to the same cause. In such a manner, an HTM node, and an HTM in general, may assign sequences to a cause based on rhythm (i.e., the timing relationship from one element in a sequence to the next element in the sequence) and/or tempo (i.e., the overall speed of the sequence).

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, pooling may involve controlling an HTM node to assign two or more patterns to the same cause. For example, a higher level HTM node may send a signal to a lower level HTM node directing the lower level HTM node to assign two or more patterns received by the lower level HTM node to the same cause. These two or more patterns may have no spatial overlap or temporal relationship.

Learning Groups of Actions

In addition to learning sequences of sensed input patterns with common causes, HTMs may also be used to learn the actions governing a sequence of sensed input patterns. An action is any kind of event or function which changes a set of sensed inputs to the learning systems. An action can change the set of sensed inputs in a deterministic or stochastic manner. FIG. 10 illustrates four sequences of sensed input pattern governed by the action of “moving to the right”. In FIG. 10, a right corner, a smiley face and a diagonal line are shown moving to the right over 4 time points. When observed side by side, it is apparent that all three sequences have a common action governing the sequence of images. This information can be learned and applied to infer actions governing new sequences of sensed inputs.

The ability to infer that a sequence of sensed inputs is governed by one or more actions has many practical applications over a wide number of domains such as: video processing, biotechnology, audio processing and financial analysis. The inference of one or more actions which govern a sequence of events is also referred to as “reverse engineering”.

Actions governing sequences can be inferred by learning groups of sequences of sensed input patterns governed by a set of actions. The groups of sequences of sensed input patterns can be learned using supervising learning techniques based on sequences of sensed input patterns which are generated by performing an action on data in order to generate patterns of real-world data specific to that action. The actions that may be performed on data may be performed by applying one or more algorithms to real-world data to generate a simulated set of sensed input patterns. The actions may also be performed by physically perturbing a real-world system and collecting the generated sensed input patterns.

This type of reverse engineering can by applied in the area of biosciences. A cell or other biological system may be systematically perturbed using a set of actions in order to generate time series data associated with the actions. Actions that can be performed include treating the biological system with a drug or compound, modifying the environment of the biological system or altering deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) associated with the biological system. Time series quantitative information regarding the protein or mRNA levels of the cell may be collected and labeled according to each action performed. Groups of time-series data associated with each action may be learned and used in inference to diagnose or determine a state of a cell.

Action based learning can also be applied in robotics. A robot or other computing device that is equipped with apparatus to detect sensory inputs can be programmed to perform a set of actions. These actions may be performed by the robot in different combinations in order to observe the resultant sequences of sensory inputs. By performing actions and observing sensory inputs caused by the actions, a robot can learn to associate new sequences of sensory inputs with sets of actions. The identification of sets of actions associated with newly sensed inputs is valuable in environments where multiple actors (humans or robots) could be performing actions. For example, a robot that observes a sequence of sensed inputs representing a moving box may be able to identify that the box is being pushed by another entity.

Action based learning may also be used in the area of computer vision in order to improve the accuracy of object recognition. For example, a robot or other computing device can be programmed to perform a set of actions in order to generate a set of sensed inputs associated with an object. For example, a robot can systematically adjust the position of camera associated with the robot while keeping an object within the view of the camera. By performing these actions, the robot may generate sequences of sensed inputs which represent observing the object from different perspectives. The robot can then perform this set of actions at a later time when a new object is encountered in order to generate a new set of sensed inputs which may correspond to the learned set of sensed inputs associated with the object. Likewise, the robot or computer device may be programmed to perform other types actions associated with other types of sensory inputs (e.g. tactile inputs, audio inputs) in order to learn other types of sensed input patterns associated with an object.

In the domain of video data or motion capture, it is often useful to identify an action associated with video data. Using action based learning, video data associated with different actions such as a bank robbery, a drunk driver or a wobbling structure may be created or labeled. Groups of video data associated with these actions may then be learned based on simulated or labeled video data and used in inference to determine actions associated with new video data.

Action based learning may also be applied to the problem of source separation in audio data. The “cocktail party” problem of segmenting audio data according to source in order to automatically transcribe conversations recorded in a party or conference room is one such application. Action based learning may be applied to audio data captured by a microphone which is either physically moved towards a speaker or audio data is which simulated to move towards a speaker. By learning the sequences of audio inputs associated with the motion of the microphone, these motions may be applied to new audio data in order to segment the conversation according to the speakers.

In addition to inference of an action associated with a sequence of sensed input patterns, information regarding an action governing the cause may facilitate the determination that the inputs in a sequence of inputs have the same cause. In FIG. 10, the sequences labeled s2 and s4 depict a set of four shapes moving to the right and left respectively. In the two cases, the cause of the sensed input (i.e. the set of four shapes) is the same. Without knowledge that the inputs in s2 and s4 are moving right, the separate input patterns in these sequences at t1 and t4 may be determined to have a different cause because the number of shapes in each input pattern differs. Therefore, the identification that s2 and s4 are governed by the same action may assist in the determination that all sensed input patterns in sequences s1 and s2 have the same cause. The complimentary effect of action and cause inference is discussed in detail below in the section titled Determining Causes and Actions of Novel Input.

In practical application, actions or functions are very complex and often interrelated. At any given time, there can be a series of actions which are being performed, each of which subsume many sub-actions. An example of this is operating a vehicle. FIG. 11 illustrates a hierarchy representing the actions required to drive a vehicle. At a high or top-level, driving a vehicle may be represented as one action. At any given time while driving a vehicle, many different sub-actions may be performed such as turning right, turning left or going straight. Each of these actions is also comprised of a set of sub-actions of turning or not turning the wheel, upshifting or downshifting the gears, pressing or releasing the brakes and pressing or releasing the gas pedals.

The hierarchy of actions illustrated in FIG. 11 is also correlated with the way that actions are performed over time. Actions performed at lower-level nodes such as turning the wheel, upshifting the gears, pressing the brakes or releasing the gas pedal, occur over shorter time intervals and change more rapidly than the actions the mid-level nodes. Actions at the mid-level nodes may change or be performed in any order while the top-level action of driving a car is persistent over a long time interval.

FIG. 12 a illustrates a cyclic model of action based perception as applied in machine learning. A hierarchy of actions is first built to model a set of actions. An action or function is performed which affects the nodes in hierarchy of actions that are currently active or performed at a given time point. This performance of an action then affects a perception model by causing the actions or functions indicated by the action model to be performed, producing sequences of sensed input patterns governed by the actions. These sequences of sensed input patterns, as governed by the actions or functions indicated by the action model, then form the input for the perception model. According to the embodiment, the perception network may be an HTM network, a neural network or any other type of statistical inference model. The sensed input patterns are processed by the HTM network to make inferences which may be used to determine a next action to perform.

FIG. 12 b provides an illustration of an action model governing an HTM network. There is not necessarily a clear one-to-one correspondence between the nodes in the HTM network and the action model. Generally, the actions of driving a car may affect the sensed inputs at a very high level node, whereas lower level actions will have a more direct influence on the input patterns that are begin immediately sensed at child nodes in the HTM network.

FIG. 13 illustrates a flow process of training an HTM network to identify and infer actions associated with a sequence of inputs. As a preliminary step, a computational model of actions will be specified. According to the embodiment, the computational model of actions may be hierarchical or a simple “flat” model of actions that may be performed by the system. Various methods of specifying and constructing a hierarchical model of actions are well known to those skilled in the art of knowledge representation. These methods include the use of ontologies such as the Cyc ontology, trees, schemas and scripts. Action models can also be learned using an HTM network by feeding outputs from proprioceptive outputs from actuators/muscle-joints as the sensory inputs the HTM network.

An action is the selected to be performed upon objects in order to generate labeled temporal data. The generation of labeled data by performing actions is based on the concept that when an action is being performed by an entity, the entity understands what action is being performed. This can also be called “hypothesis driven learning”. Performing an action or function ST133 upon objects or data which in turn generates input patterns used as input to an HTM node. Although the input data is not labeled, the identity of the action becomes the label for the data. The input patterns are labeled as to the set of actions in the action model which are currently being performed at the time the input patterns are generated. In alternate embodiments, a set of temporal input patterns may be manually curated or labeled with a set of actions and used as input to an HTM node.

The HTM node receives the input patterns labeled according to actions and learns groups of sequences associated with each action. In most embodiments, groups of sequences associated with actions are learned independently of sequence learning. The set of sequential of input patterns labeled with the same actions assigned to a single sequence.

In other embodiments, sequence learning may be partially based on the labeled actions. Then the HTM node learns ST135 groups of sequences based on the labeled sequences. This process is outlined below with respect to FIGS. 14 and 15. The HTM node can use the learned groups of sequences to infer ST136 the likelihood that new temporal data is associated with an action.

FIG. 14 illustrates a simple example of learning high-order groups based on labeled input data. Sequences are determined in association with learned inputs. The sequences are labeled according to the active nodes in the action model. This example uses a very simple model comprising the actions “move”, “move left” and “move right”. The sequences are labeled corresponding to the activity of the action model during the time points the input patterns were as received at the node. FIG. 14 shows a chart to illustrate the enumeration of sequences that are labeled with actions. In FIG. 14 each sequence is labeled as either moving left or moving right. All sequences are labeled as moving. The high-order groups determined based on this chart are illustrated in FIG. 14.

FIG. 16 shows a node 40 having a action learning functionality. The node 40 has a coincidence detector 42 and an action learner 49. Based on the probabilities outputted over time by the coincidence detector 42, the action learner 49 outputs a distribution P(e⁻ _(t)|A), where P(e⁻ _(t)|A) represents the probability of observing e⁻ (evidence from a lower level) at time t over learned high-order groups of sequences associated with actions A. Thus, each probability P(e⁻ _(t)|A) corresponds to a different action A_(i). In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the learned high-order groups of sequences associated with actions themselves may not be communicated outside of the action learner 49. Further, note that the action learner 49, has a behavior (i.e., outputting probabilities based on learned groups of sequences associated with actions) that may be independent of a type and/or topology of network of which the sequence learner 44 is part.

Determining Cause and Actions of Novel Input

After an HTM has learned one or more causes and actions in its world, the HTM may determine causes of novel input and actions governing novel input using what may be referred to as “inference.” In general, presented with novel sensed input data, an HTM may infer which of its learned causes is/are the source of the novel sensed input data based on statistical comparisons of learned groups of sequences in sensed input patterns with the novel sensed input. The HTM node may further infer one or more actions which govern the novel sensed input data based on statistical comparisons with the sequence of sensed input patterns.

In one or more embodiments, both a cause and an action are determined based on new sequences of sensed input patterns. An HTM node receives the newly sensed sequence of input patterns, the HTM node assigns probabilities as to the likelihood that the new sequence of sensed input patterns matches each of its learned sequences of sensed input patterns, each of which represents a cause. The HTM node also assigns probabilities as to the likelihood that new sequence of sensed input patterns is governed by each of it's learned high-order groups of sequences associated with actions. Then, as described above, the probabilities learned by the HTM node are passed to a higher level node.

The parent node may then determine groups of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with actions and causes among the distributions sent from its child nodes, and then, based on its learned sensed input patterns and groups thereof, pass to a yet higher level node its own belief as to the likelihood that each of its learned causes and actions is the cause or action associated with sensed groups at its input. In other words, a parent node forms its own “higher level” belief as to the cause or action associated with sensed sequences of input patterns at least partly based on some statistical convergence of the beliefs passed from its child nodes.

In some embodiments, the inference of a cause and an action governing a new sequence of sensed input patterns are not independent. That is, the probability that a newly sensed sequence of input patterns is associated with a cause may partially depend on the probability that the newly sensed input pattern is governed by an action. If a sequence has been identified with high likelihood to be governed by an action that operates on a single object or cause, then the HTM node may recognize that the sequence contains input patterns representing the same cause. Conversely, a high likelihood that a sequence of input pattern has a single cause may be used to determine that an action is governing a sequence of input patterns. If it is known whether or not a sequence represents the same cause, then the probability or likelihood that the sequence of input patterns is associated with an action may be determined with a greater confidence level.

Note that the distribution passed by an HTM node is derived from a “belief” as to the likelihood that each learned cause or action is the cause or action of sensed input patterns at the input of the HTM node. A “belief” also includes those messages that are derived from or based on the belief. For example, an HTM node having learned five causes may deterministically assign probabilities that represent the probability that each of the five learned causes is the cause of the sensed sequence of input patterns. In one embodiment, the inputs are not exclusively associated with a single cause. Therefore, in some instances one or more scores indicating the probability that learned causes are the cause of the sensed input could equal 1 or a corresponding score which indicates a high likelihood that the learned cause is the cause of the sensed inputs. These scores (or “beliefs” as described above) may be normalized (or un-normalized) and passed to a parent node.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, one or more prior probabilities may be set manually in addition to or instead of having prior probabilities set via prediction. In other words, an HTM may be manually controlled to anticipate a particular cause or set of causes.

Belief Propagation

As described above, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, inferring causes of sensed input patterns involves passing beliefs from lower level nodes to higher level nodes. In FIG. 17, such “belief propagation” is shown in HTM 80 (beliefs indicated with arrows; nodes shown, but not labeled). Generally, as described above, a belief is a vector of values, where each value represents a different cause. A current belief of a node may be a distribution of several causes being at least partially active at the same time. Further, the values in the belief vector may be normalized so that a stronger likelihood of one cause represented in the vector will diminish the likelihood of other causes represented in the vector. Further, note that a meaning of a value representing a cause in a belief vector may not vary depending on what other causes represented in the belief vector are active.

As described above with reference to FIG. 2, an HTM is a hierarchy of connected nodes. Each node may be thought as having a belief. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, a belief at one node may influence a belief at another node dependent on, for example, whether the nodes are connected via a conditional probability table (CPT).

A CPT is a matrix of numbers, where each column of the matrix corresponds to the individual beliefs from one node, and where each row of the matrix corresponds to the individual beliefs from another node. Thus, note that by multiplying a vector representing a belief in a source node by an appropriate CPT results in a vector in the dimension and “language” of beliefs of a destination node. For example, in an HTM-based system designed for operation in a “weather” domain, a lower level node may form a belief about air temperature and have values representing the likelihood of the following causes: “hot”; “warm”; “mild”; “cold”; and “freezing”. A higher level node may form a belief about precipitation and have values representing the likelihood of the following causes: “sunny”; “rain”; “sleet”; and “snow”. Thus, using a CPT, the belief about air temperature in the lower level node may inform the belief about precipitation in the higher level node (and vice-versa). In other words, multiplying the vector representing the belief about air temperature in the lower level node by the CPT results in a vector representing the appropriate belief about precipitation in the higher level node.

Accordingly, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, belief propagation allows an HTM to infer causes such that each node in the HTM represents a belief that is maximally or optimally consistent with its input. Note that performing inference in such a manner results in ambiguities being resolved as beliefs ascend through the HTM. For example, in an HTM (or part thereof) having a parent node and two child nodes, if (i) the first child node believes with 80% certainty that it is seeing a “dog” and with 20% certainty that it is seeing a “cat” and (ii) the second child=node believes with 80% certainty that it is hearing a “pig” and with 20% certainty that it is hearing a “cat,” then the parent node may decide with relatively high certainty that a “cat” is present and not a “dog” or “pig.” The parent node effectively settled on “cat” because this belief is the only one that is consistent with its inputs, despite the fact the “cat” image and the “cat” sound were not the most likely beliefs of its child nodes.

Further, as described above, a higher level node in an HTM may pass a “prediction” to a lower level node in the HTM. The “prediction” is a “belief” in that it contains values representing the likelihoods of different causes. The vector representing the belief in the higher level node may be multiplied by an appropriate CPT to inform a belief in the lower level node. Thus, in effect, a higher level node in an HTM uses its learned sequences combined with recent state information (i.e., the current input to the higher level node) to (i) predict what its next belief should be and (ii) then pass the expectation down to one or more lower level nodes in the HTM.

FIG. 18 shows a flow process in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Particularly, FIG. 18 shows in summary the steps of belief propagation described above. Initially, a current node in the HTM receives input (in the form of sensed input patterns or beliefs from lower level nodes) ST82. Based on the received input and any beliefs passed down from a higher level node, the current node forms/adjusts its belief as to the likelihood of causes at its input distributed over its learned causes ST84. This belief is then passed to higher level and/or lower level nodes to inform beliefs at those nodes ST86.

Architecture

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, at least part of an HTM network may be provided as a software platform. As shown in FIG. 19, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, an HTM network (nodes shown, but not labeled) 164 may run across several CPUs 166, 168, 170. The CPUs 166, 168, 170 may either be part of a single system (e.g., a single server) or multiple systems. For example, an HTM network may be created in software across several multiprocessor servers, where such a group of servers may be referred to as a “cluster.” The servers in a cluster may be heterogeneous, i.e., the servers may have differing configurations/specifications (e.g., clock speeds, memory size, number of processors per server). Further, the servers may be connected via Ethernet or one or more other networking protocols such as, for example, Infiniband, Myrinet, or over a memory bus. Further, the servers may run any operating system (OS) (e.g., Windows, Linux). In general, each of the servers in a cluster may be responsible for running some portion of an HTM network. The portion of the HTM network dedicated to each server may vary from server to server depending on, for example, the configuration/specification of each server.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the CPUs over which an HTM network runs may be located at a single location (e.g., at a datacenter) or at locations remote from one another.

As described above, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, at least part of an HTM network may be provided as a software platform. The software executables for creating and running the HTM network may be referred to as being part of a “runtime engine.” As shown in FIG. 15, a runtime engine 172 of an HTM-based system includes, in addition to the executables for running an HTM network 174, a Supervisor entity 176. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 is responsible for, among other things, starting and stopping the HTM network 174 and communicating with external applications (i.e., “tools”) 180, 182, 184, each of which are further described below. However, although the Supervisor entity 176 may be used to start and stop the HTM network 174, it may not be necessary for the Supervisor entity 176 to be running while the HTM network 174 is in operation.

As shown in FIG. 20, the Supervisor entity 176 is associated with a net list 178. The Supervisor entity 176 uses a description in the net list 178 to configure the HTM network 174. For example, a description in the net list 178 may specify the distribution of nodes across a given set of CPUs. However, in one or more other embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may configure an HTM network dynamically if, for example, certain information is not contained in the net list 178. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may read a net list from a date file. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a net list may be specified interactively by a user using one or more tools 180, 182, 184.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may perform global network actions, distribute nodes across CPUs, and/or coordinate CPU activity/behavior. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may enforce licensing restrictions such as those relating to, for example, the number of usable CPUs, license expiration dates, number of user limitations, and/or the ability to load third-party “plug-ins.”

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may check for software updates on some regular basis. In such embodiments, if there is a software update available, the Supervisor entity 176 may, for example, install the software update and restart the HTM network 174. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may determine and/or select the order in which portions of the HTM network 174 are to be updated.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may communicate with one or more CPUs (not shown in FIG. 15) running the HTM network 174 using, for example, a private or internal application program interface (API). Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 and the one or more CPUs (not shown in FIG. 15) running the HTM network 174 may all be on the same local area network (LAN).

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may run on a CPU separate from one or more CPUs (not shown in FIG. 15) running the HTM network 174. However, in one or more other embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 176 may run on a CPU that runs all or part of the HTM network 174.

FIG. 21 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system that runs an HTM network 186 on a single CPU 188. In such embodiments of the present invention, an instance of Supervisor entity 190, along with a net list 192, may run on CPU 188. Further, as shown in FIG. 19, a runtime engine 194 may be composed of the software executables for the HTM network 186, the Supervisor entity 190, and the net list 192.

FIG. 22 shows at least a portion of an HTM-based system that runs an HTM network 220 on multiple CPUs 222, 224, 226. The CPUs 222, 224, 226 may all be part of the same server (thereby, sharing resources of that server) or they may be distributed over two or more servers. An instance of Supervisor entity 228, along with a net list 230, may run on a separate CPU 232. In such embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor entity 228 may communicate (across, for example, a switch 234) with instances of “node processing units” (NPUs) 236, 238, 240 running on each of the CPUs 222, 224, 226. Each NPU 236, 238, 240 may be a software component that is responsible for running and/or scheduling a portion (i.e., a “sub-net”) of the HTM network 220 running on the CPU 222, 224, 226 to which the NPU 236, 238, 240 is respectively allocated. At an initial stage, each NPU 236, 238, 240 may receive information from the Supervisor entity 228 describing all or part of the HTM network 220, including information relating to the portion of the HTM network 220 that each NPU 236, 238, 240 will manage. Further, each NPU 236, 238, 240 may be responsible for allocating the memory needed for the nodes, links, and other data structures for the portion of the HTM network 220 for which it is responsible. Further, each NPU 236, 238, 240 may run and/or schedule a portion of the HTM network 220 in some timing relation to at least one other NPU 236, 238, 240.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, each NPU 236, 238, 240 may maintain a local net list. A local net list may be used by an NPU to determine when to update one or more nodes, where “updating” a node may include executing an operation of the node and then updating the state of the node. An NPU may perform such updating based on, for example, one or more timestamps of previous updates of one or more nodes, one or more values (e.g., beliefs) of one or more nodes, priorities of one or more nodes, and/or a set of rules for updating nodes.

Further, as shown in FIG. 22, a runtime engine 242 may be composed of the software executables for the HTM network 220, the Supervisor entity 228, the net list 230, and the NPUs 236, 238, 240. Moreover, a file server (not shown) may be present to store file information for one or more of the various components shown in FIG. 17.

Further, as shown, for example, in FIG. 22, there is one NPU per CPU running a portion of an HTM network. However, in one or more other embodiments of the present invention, there may be a different relationship as to the number of NPUs allocated per CPU.

As described above with reference to FIG. 20 (also shown in FIGS. 21 and 22), a runtime engine 1720 running HTM network 174 may interface with one or more tools 180, 182, 184. Each of these tools 180, 182, 184 may be used by a user (e.g., a software developer) to, for example, modify, improve, augment, restrict, configure, or otherwise affect an operation or configuration of the HTM network 174 or a CPU on which the HTM network 174 runs. Generally, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, Configurator tool 180 may be used to create and/or configure an HTM network, Trainer tool 182 may be used to create a trained HTM network for a particular application, and/or Debugger tool 184 may be used to debug the operation of an HTM network. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, tools (not shown) may be provided to, for example, monitor/report performance of an HTM network and/or deploy a designed, trained, and/or debugged HTM network as a running application. In general, one or more embodiments of the present invention may use any number and/or types of different tools to interface with an HTM network.

In one or more embodiments of the present invention, a Supervisor entity (e.g., 176 in FIG. 20, 190 in FIG. 21, 228 in FIG. 22) may communicate with developer/client tools (e.g., 180, 182, 184 in FIG. 20) using a designated Supervisor API. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor API may support Unicode and/or multi-byte character sets.

Because the developer/client tools may reside at, or otherwise be accessible from, locations remote from a location running a particular HTM network, a Supervisor API may be accessible through, for example, a firewall. One protocol that may be used to facilitate such accessibility involves encoding messages in Extensible Markup Language (XML) and passing them over the Internet (i.e., HTTP transmission). If security is desired or required, then messages may be passed over a secure Internet protocol (e.g., HTTPS transmission). Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, if a Supervisor entity (e.g., 176 in FIG. 20, 190 in FIG. 21, 228 in FIG. 22) and developer/client tools (e.g., 180, 182, 184 in FIG. 20) are on the same LAN, messages may be passed using means such as, for example, socket connections and/or pipes.

As described above, a Supervisor API may interact with developer/client tools. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor API may be used to authenticate one or more client applications attempting to communicate with a Supervisor entity (e.g., 176 in FIG. 20, 190 in FIG. 21, 228 in FIG. 22). If the client is authenticated, the Supervisor API may return session information to the client and connect the client with the Supervisor entity. The Supervisor API may also disconnect the client from the Supervisor entity.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a net list describing all or part of an HTM network may be passed from a client to a Supervisor entity through a Supervisor API. Further, a Supervisor API may be used to return state information to the client. State information may include, for example, the beliefs at one or more nodes of the HTM network, whether the HTM network is running, paused, or restarting, the number of nodes in all or part of the HTM network, and the number of CPUs actively running portions of the HTM network. Further, a Supervisor API may be accessed to start, pause and restart, or stop an HTM network.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a Supervisor API may be accessed to: return a list of network files that have been stored by a system (e.g., a cluster of servers) used to run an HTM network; load an HTM network from a network file stored locally in a system (e.g., a cluster of servers) usable to run an HTM network; locally save a state of an HTM network in a system (e.g., a cluster of servers) running the HTM network; move one or more nodes from running on one CPU to running on another CPU; turn a debugging feature “on” or “off”; retrieve detailed state information of a component in an HTM network; set a state of a component in an HTM network; instruct an HTM network to pause operations after a specific triggering event, where the triggering event may be completion of one complete iteration of the HTM network, completion of updating a given list of nodes, completion of updating one node on each CPU, reaching a particular time, reaching a particular node value, and/or an occurrence of an error; retrieve statistics regarding operation of an HTM network; request storage of historical data regarding an HTM network; retrieve stored historical data regarding an HTM network; retrieve messages from an event log that, for example, occurred during a particular time frame; execute an OS command; reboot a set of servers used to run an HTM network; and/or request the triggering of an alarm if certain conditions are met.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a Supervisory API may have a “batch command” system. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, a batch command system may be used to execute one or more operations of a Supervisor API in a particular sequence. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a batch command system may be used to execute one or more of the same commands on more than one node. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, a batch command system may include the capabilities of a full scripting language (e.g., Python, Perl) so that, for example, ‘if’ statements and loops may be performed easily. Note that the use of a full scripting language may allow a user to script complex commands (e.g., commands: train level 1 of hierarchy until states of level 1 nodes reach a given condition; then turn “off” learning in level 1 and train level 2 of hierarchy until states of level 2 nodes reach a given condition, etc.).

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor API may be arranged to handle a failure of any of the hardware components needed to run a particular HTM network. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor API may handle a software failure (e.g., failure of an NPU instance). Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor API may handle a communication establishment error. Further, in one or more embodiments of the present invention, the Supervisor API may handle one or more errors in reading a provided net list describing a particular HTM network.

In addition to the Supervisor API, an HTM-based system may also have a Node Plug-in API 250 as shown in FIG. 23. In FIG. 23 (elements labeled similarly to that shown in FIG. 19), the Node Plug-in API 250 may be used to create new node types. For example, the Node Plug-in API 250 may be used to interface new hardware for running the HTM network 186 and/or implement, for example, new learning algorithms. In one or more embodiments of the present invention, using the Node Plug-in API 250, one or more “plug-ins” may be dynamically loaded when the HTM network 186 is initialized or rebooted. In such a manner, a functionality of a runtime engine running the HTM network 186 may be extended as further described below.

While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. 

1. A computer-implemented method of determining an action associated with a sequence of sensed input patterns, the method executed by one or more computer systems and comprising: generating a set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with a set of actions, by performing at least a first action on data derived from a real-world system; determining that a subset of the sequences of sensed input patterns form a group associated with the first action, wherein the first action is associated with a hierarchy of actions; receiving a new sequence of sensed input patterns; determining a first value which indicates the probability that the new sequence of sensed input patterns is associated with the first action based on the subset of sequences of sensed input patterns; and storing the first value in a memory associated with the computer system.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving the set of sequences of sensed input patterns at a child node in a hierarchical network of nodes; receiving the new sequence of sensed input patterns at the child node in the hierarchical network of nodes; and transmitting the first value from the child node in the hierarchical network of nodes to a parent node in the hierarchical network of nodes.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the hierarchical network of nodes is a Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM).
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: responsive to the first value which indicates the probability that the new sequence of sensed input patterns is associated with the first action, labeling the new sequence of sensed inputs with the action.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the first action is associated with a hierarchy of actions and further comprising labeling the new sequence of sense inputs with at least a second action based on the hierarchy of actions.
 6. A computer system comprising: a memory; a processor; a child node module stored in the memory and executable by the processor to: receive a set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with a set of actions, wherein the set of actions are associated with a hierarchy of actions that defines a set of subsumptive relationships between the actions; determine that a subset of the sequences of sensed input patterns form a group associated with a first action, wherein the first action is associated with a hierarchy of actions; receive a new sequence of sensed input patterns; determine a first value which indicates the probability that the new sequence of sensed input patterns is associated with the first action based on the group associated with the first action; label the new sequence of sensed input patterns with the first action and at least a second action responsive to the first value exceeding a threshold value, wherein the at least a second action is determined according to the set of subsumptive relationships defined by the hierarchy of actions; and store the first value in a memory associated with the child node.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the child node is further adapted to transmit the first value to a parent node.
 8. The system of claim 6, further comprising labeling the set of sequences of sensed input patterns with the set of actions.
 9. The system of claim 6, wherein the set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with the set of actions are derived from computationally performing the set of actions on real-world data.
 10. The system of claim 6, wherein the set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with the set of actions are derived from physically performing the set of actions on one or more real-world systems.
 11. A computer-readable storage medium encoded with executable computer program code, the program code comprising program code for: receiving, at a child node, a set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with a set of actions, wherein the set of actions are associated with a hierarchy of actions that defines a set of subsumptive relationships between the actions; determining, at the child node, that a subset of the sequences of sensed input patterns form a group associated with a first action, wherein the first action is associated with a hierarchy of actions; receiving, at the child node, a new sequence of sensed input patterns; determining, at the child node, a first value which indicates the probability that the new sequence of sensed input patterns is associated with the first action based on the group associated with the first action; responsive to the first value exceeding and at least second action; and storing the first value in a memory associated with the child node.
 12. The medium of claim 11, further comprising program code for a parent node and the child node comprise a hierarchical network of nodes.
 13. The medium of claim 11, further comprising labeling the set of sequences of sensed input patterns with the set of actions.
 14. The medium of claim 11, wherein the set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with the set of actions are derived from computationally performing the set of actions on real-world data.
 15. The medium of claim 11, wherein the set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with the set of actions are derived from computationally performing the set of actions on real-world data.
 16. A computer-readable storage medium encoded with executable computer program code, the program code comprising program code for: generating a set of sequences of sensed input patterns associated with a set of actions, by performing at least a first action on data derived from a real-world system; determining that a subset of the sequences of sensed input patterns form a group associated with the first action, wherein the first action is associated with a hierarchy of actions; receiving a new sequence of sensed input patterns; determining a first value which indicates the probability that the new sequence of sensed input patterns is associated with the first action and at least a first based on the subset of sequences of sensed input patterns; and storing the first value.
 17. The medium of claim 16, further comprising: receiving the set of sequences of sensed input patterns at a child node in a hierarchical network of nodes; receiving the new sequence of sensed input patterns at the child node in the hierarchical network of nodes; and transmitting the first value from the child node in the hierarchical network of nodes to a parent node in the hierarchical network of nodes.
 18. The medium of claim 17, wherein the hierarchical network of nodes is a Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM). 